Mon, Sep 14, 2026
Ashok Khemka, a retired Haryana cadre IAS officer of the 1991-batch, was moved over 55 times in 34 years. Tukaram Mundhe, a serving 2005-batch officer of the Maharashtra cadre, has been transferred 25 times in 21 years. Now a relatively younger officer, Neha Marvya, has made headlines for being reassigned for the fourth time in a year.
Marvya, 40, said she was “very disturbed” and “demotivated” by the latest transfer. The 2011-batch Madhya Pradesh cadre officer’s latest posting ended just 50 days after she assumed charge, prompting her to question the administrative system.
“By the time I understand the charge, I get removed,” she said, questioning how an officer could be expected to deliver results when postings are curtailed before they have had time to understand the department.
The transfer came shortly after a confrontation with employees at the Tribal Area Development Project, where she had been serving as director.
In a message shared with the Madhya Pradesh IAS Officers’ Association’s WhatsApp group, a screenshot of which is with The Secretariat, Marvya alleged that some of her subordinates had openly opposed her, threatened to have her transferred, and caused a “mutiny” against her.
Marvya has now been appointed managing director of the Madhya Pradesh Scheduled Tribe Finance and Development Corporation, a post equivalent to that of Additional Secretary.
She said an officer could hardly understand the responsibilities of a new assignment within a month and questioned what she could have done in such a short period to warrant another transfer.
“An officer hardly understands the work in a month. Yet I have been humiliated by this transfer,” she wrote.
Her latest transfer has now renewed debate over the impact of frequent reassignments on administrative continuity and an officer’s ability to implement policies and deliver results.
While he was not aware of her case, a senior serving IAS officer of the AGMUT cadre (Jammu and Kashmir segment) said on condition of anonymity, "It is true that frequent transfers affect the reputation of an officer and career progression."
"Frequent transfers also create a perception about political pressure that weakens bureaucratic independence. As a result, an officer becomes cautious and vulnerable," he said.
There has, however, been no response from the IAS Officers’ Association on Marvya’s allegations.
Marvya’s allegations have also raised questions about the working environment of civil servants and the extent to which internal conflicts within departments can influence an officer’s tenure.
She said she had reported instances of insubordination, files being deliberately held back, and other difficulties. According to her, no action was taken against those she had complained about, and it was she who was moved from the post instead.
“I reported insubordination and hoarding of files, but instead of action, I was removed,” she wrote in her message.
The latest transfer followed a pen-down protest by employees after Marvya issued notices to them, seeking explanations. The officer said she was transferred barely 50 days after taking charge.
Marvya questioned whether an IAS officer could become so vulnerable that subordinates could threaten to influence the posting.
The officer said she had accepted transfer orders respectfully in the past but felt particularly demoralised by the latest move. She also alleged that she had endured periods of being sidelined and denied work for years, hoping that the situation would eventually improve.
“I have kept patience for years, hoping things would improve, but now subordinates have started threatening me,” she said.
Marvya ended her message with a pointed criticism of the system, warning that her experience could happen to other officers as well. “Always conspirators win, and I fail. The system has failed me. Today it is me, tomorrow another IAS officer will be the target,” she wrote.
The latest move has also brought renewed attention to her earlier postings and disputes during her career in Madhya Pradesh. In January 2025, she was removed as Dindori collector after serving around eight months in the district.
In 2017, while serving as chief executive officer of the Shivpuri district panchayat, she was involved in a dispute with the then Collector O.P. Srivastava over vehicle payments.
In 2022, Marvya alleged that the then Principal Secretary Manish Rastogi had denied her entry while assuming charge of a posting in the revenue department.
The officer, originally from Uttar Pradesh, joined the IAS in August 2011 after completing a B. Tech degree. Over the years, she has held several administrative assignments in Madhya Pradesh, including field postings as a district collector, with responsibilities spanning rural development, administrative digitisation, and public grievance redressal.