Tue, Oct 06, 2026
When the Supreme Court reaches for the language of crime to describe a chemist’s bill, the problem has outgrown polite euphemism.
In September, a Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, hearing a petition on hospital drug pricing, held up a single example: a cancer medicine supplied to the trade at about ₹2,700 and sold to the patient at a printed price of ₹27,000 — a 10-fold markup. Justice Mehta called it “broad daylight dacoity”; the Court called the wider pattern “carnage”. It was not rhetoric. It accurately described the most reliable route from the middle class into penury in India today: the medical bill.
Illness is now among the country’s largest single causes of impoverishment. A single hospitalisation can erase a family’s savings, mortgage its land, and pull it below the poverty line in a week. A 2018 study by researchers at the Public Health Foundation of India, published in the British Medical Journal, estimated that out-of-pocket health spending pushed roughly 55 million Indians into poverty in a single year — 38 million of them by the cost of medicines alone, and more people than live in most countries on earth. This is not a story of one greedy hospital or one costly drug. It is a structural failure in how a nation of 1.4 billion pays for staying alive — and, in its current form, it is about to get worse rather than better.
For a decade, the government had a reassuring headline. According to the National Health Accounts, out-of-pocket expenditure fell steadily from 64.2% of total health spending in 2013-14 to 39.4% in 2021-22, while the government’s share rose to 48%. On paper, the state was finally carrying more of the load.
Look closer, and the comfort dissolves — because that story has just reversed. The most recent National Health Accounts, for 2022-23 and released only in May 2026, show out-of-pocket spending climbing back up to 43.4% of total health expenditure, even as the government’s share slipped from 48% to 43.7% and public health spending fell from 1.84% to 1.48% of GDP. The much-celebrated decline, it turns out, was fragile — propped up by a pandemic-era surge in government outlays. Households are once again being asked to carry more, not less: they still fund well over two-fifths of all health spending - among the worst ratios for any large economy. Prescribed medicines alone account for roughly 16% of the bill, the single biggest item that comes straight out of the patient’s pocket.
Meanwhile, the public purse is not filling the gap it has opened. Union health outlay for 2026-27 is about ₹1.06 lakh crore — still only around 2% of the Budget — while the National Health Policy’s promise of 2.5% of GDP by 2025 has quietly lapsed, unmet and largely unmentioned. The commitment was always modest; even that ambition has now slipped.
Nor does insurance fill the void. Ayushman Bharat was designed for the poorest two-fifths of the population; private and employer cover protects a thin slice at the top. In between sits what the NITI Aayog itself has called the “missing middle” — at least 30% of Indians, some 400 million people, with no financial protection against a health shock at all. They are too well-off to qualify for the scheme and too stretched to afford a premium, and it is precisely they who stand one hospital admission away from the poverty line.
To its credit, the government can point to a real expansion of access. By mid-2026, it reported more than 440 million Ayushman cards issued, about 36,000 empanelled hospitals, treatment worth over ₹1.8 lakh crore, a network of more than 180,000 Ayushman Arogya Mandirs for primary care, and over 18,000 Jan Aushadhi stores selling generic medicines at 50% to 90% below market price.
The reach is genuine and not to be dismissed. But reach is not the same as protection, and the test of protection is whether a family is shielded from catastrophic costs. On that test, the country is slipping backwards even as the network widens — more cards, more centres, and yet a larger share of the bill landing straight back on the household.
The burden is also profoundly unequal across a federal nation. States such as Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, and West Bengal still meet more than half their health costs out of pocket; in Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab and others, households spend more per head than their governments do. Bihar’s strikingly low per capita out-of-pocket figure is not a badge of protection but of care foregone — people too poor to spend simply going without. Only three states — Delhi, Odisha, and Rajasthan — meet the policy norm of 8% of their budget on health. The poorest, most populous states, where the need is greatest, protect their people least.
The crisis, then, is not an accident of being a developing country. It is the product of specific, nameable failures — and what can be named can be fixed.
None of what follows is utopian. Each repair addresses a fault line above, and most already exist somewhere in India as law, policy, or working pilot — waiting only to be taken seriously and scaled nationally.
The proposed insurance co-pay is the detail that reveals the whole design. A citizen who did everything right — bought comprehensive cover, paid rising premiums year after year — would still be handed a tenth of the hospital bill, precisely when he is least able to argue over it from a hospital bed.
It is the final nail in a coffin the poor and the middle class have been building, plank by plank, through stagnant public spending, unregulated private billing and a drug market the country’s highest court now likens to robbery.
None of this is inevitable. Thailand, with a fraction of India’s per capita income a generation ago, achieved near universal coverage within a decade by deciding that health was a public obligation rather than a private gamble; its citizens today face a fraction of the financial risk of their Indian counterparts. The gap is not one of wealth but of will. India already spends enough, publicly and privately combined, to protect its people far better than it does — the money simply leaks out through unregulated prices, a hospitalisation-only safety net and a public system starved into irrelevance.
The measure of a developed nation is not only the towers it raises and the rockets it launches, but the families it keeps whole when illness strikes in the night.
(The writer is a former civil servant. Views are personal)