Mon, Sep 22, 2025
The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) stands as one of the most enduring institutions of democratic India, entrusted with the responsibility of selecting individuals for the higher civil services. As it completes a hundred years of its institutional journey (1926–2026), the Commission’s history, achievements, challenges, and future direction deserve thoughtful reflection.
Over the past century, UPSC has not only served as the bedrock of India’s bureaucratic framework but has also symbolised impartiality, integrity, and meritocracy in public life. Its contribution in shaping the administrative leadership of the nation has been immense, and the way forward demands a re-imagination of its role in a fast-changing governance landscape.
The origins of UPSC lie in colonial India. The demand for an impartial and merit-based system of recruitment to civil services arose in the 19th century, culminating in the establishment of the Public Service Commission in 1926 under the Government of India Act, 1919. Initially, it had limited advisory functions, with the colonial government retaining wide discretionary powers.
Post-Independence, the framers of the Constitution recognised the need for an independent constitutional body to insulate civil service recruitment from political interference. Thus, the Union Public Service Commission was enshrined in Part XIV of the Indian Constitution (Articles 315–323). Over the decades, UPSC has evolved into a trusted institution, conducting examinations for the All India Services, Central Civil Services, and Defence Services. Its mandate has consistently been to ensure fairness, transparency, and merit in the selection of India’s administrative leadership.
UPSC has made enormous contribution to nation building. Its biggest contribution has been the institutionalisation of merit-based recruitment. By conducting competitive examinations that test intellectual ability, analytical reasoning, and general awareness, it has provided a level playing field to candidates from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. This has enhanced social mobility, allowing talent from rural and marginalised communities to join the civil services.
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel famously referred to the Indian Civil Services as the "steel frame" of India. The officers selected through UPSC have played a critical role in maintaining administrative continuity, law and order, and developmental governance across a vast and diverse country. From the early years of integrating princely states and rehabilitating refugees to managing elections and implementing welfare schemes, the civil services have been the backbone of governance.
UPSC As Unifying Force
Through its nationwide, uniform, and transparent examination system, UPSC has brought together young minds from across India. Candidates from different linguistic, cultural, and regional backgrounds converge into the civil services, creating an administrative cadre that reflects the diversity of India while upholding the unity of purpose in governance.
The UPSC has consistently maintained an apolitical stance. Its independence from the executive has ensured that recruitment is free from favouritism or political patronage. This neutrality has bolstered public trust in the institution and reinforced democratic values.
Over the years, UPSC has continuously reformed its syllabus to align with the nation’s needs. For example, the inclusion of ethics, integrity, and aptitude in the Civil Services Examination (CSE) syllabus was a recognition of the need for moral and ethical foundations in administration. Similarly, emphasis on general studies, governance, environment, and technology reflects evolving governance priorities.
Interestingly, many individuals who prepared for or joined the civil services later ventured into politics, academia, international organisations, and social movements. The training in analytical rigour, problem-solving, and public service ethos imparted by UPSC examinations has, therefore, had a ripple effect beyond bureaucracy, contributing to leadership in various domains.
UPSC In Independent India Has Witnessed The Following Phases:
Post-Independence Consolidation (1950s–1970s): Civil services officers recruited during this period were instrumental in implementing land reforms, community development programs, and institution-building. UPSC’s role was to supply a steady stream of capable administrators.
Era Of Welfare State Expansion (1970s–1990s): With the rise of poverty alleviation programs, Green Revolution, and industrialisation, administrators had to manage large-scale developmental interventions. UPSC expanded its recruitment base to include candidates from varied educational backgrounds.
Liberalisation And Globalisation (1990s–2010s): With economic reforms, the demands on bureaucracy shifted towards regulatory functions, technology adoption, and international cooperation. UPSC responded by incorporating subjects like environment, economy, and governance in its exams.
Digital Age And Governance (2010s–2020s): As India entered the digital era, the need for administrators skilled in technology, data-driven governance, and public-private partnerships became prominent. UPSC embraced these themes in its evolving syllabus.
Managing Challenges
While the Commission has made invaluable contributions, its journey has not been without challenges. Despite being a meritocratic system, UPSC examinations are often criticised for favoring urban, English-educated aspirants. Candidates from rural and vernacular backgrounds sometimes struggle due to disparities in resources, coaching facilities, and access to digital content.
The UPSC Civil Services Examination is known as one of the toughest in the world, with a success rate of less than 0.2 per cent. The long preparation period, uncertainty, and repeated attempts create enormous psychological stress among aspirants.
Critics also argue that the exam system is overly focused on academic knowledge and memory-based performance rather than practical problem-solving or administrative aptitude. There is a growing debate on whether the current system truly tests the qualities required for modern public administration.
While UPSC has enabled participation from marginalised groups through reservations, there remain concerns about gender representation and the under-representation of certain communities. Women, though increasing in number, still account for less than one-third of the recruits.
Bureaucratic inertia and outdated processes in recruitment occasionally hinder the modernisation of UPSC. The debate around lateral entry into civil services is an example of the tensions between tradition and reform.
In A Fast Evolving Governance Environment, The UPSC Will Also Need To Evolve
Redefining The Examination Pattern
Leveraging Technology For Accessibility
Promoting Diversity And Inclusiveness
Balancing Generalist And Specialist Needs
Enhancing Ethical Foundations
Internationalisation Of Civil Services
Mental Health And Candidate Well-being
Not Just A Milestone
The centenary of UPSC is not merely a milestone in the history of an institution; it is a celebration of the democratic ethos of India. For a hundred years, UPSC has ensured that public service leadership emerges not from privilege or patronage, but from merit, dedication, and intellectual rigor.
Its contribution to the making of modern India is immeasurable—shaping policies, executing reforms, and holding the nation together through its officers.
As India aspires to become a developed nation by 2047, UPSC’s role will be even more critical. It must continue to evolve—embracing technology, inclusivity, and innovation—while retaining its foundational values of integrity and neutrality. The future of governance in India will demand civil servants who are not only administrators but also visionaries, innovators, and ethical leaders.
Thus, the story of UPSC’s first hundred years is one of resilience, credibility, and contribution to nation-building. The way forward must ensure that the institution remains as relevant and robust in the next century as it has been in the past.
(The writer is a retired IAS officer. Views are personal.)