CPCB Activates Vigilance Mechanism Against Corruption

Abuse of power, financial irregularities, forged documents? India’s top body for controlling pollution looks to curb a range of complaints

Vehicular pollution in urban India as CPCB tightens vigilance against corruption

The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), India’s apex body for controlling pollution, has issued new guidelines to address complaints related to corruption, misuse of power, and irregularities.

The Vigilance Complaint Handling Mechanism guidelines have been prepared based on the rules and circulars issued by the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC).

Industrial groups and business operators across India often allege highhandedness and extra-procedural activities by officials of the pollution control authority.

In several cases, industries are allegedly forced to pay bribes to officials for obtaining environmental no-dues certificates or for resolving notices issued by the authorities.

Against this backdrop, the CPCB, following directions from the Union Environment Ministry, has issued a new order establishing a mechanism for handling vigilance complaints.

According to the guidelines, only complaints related to corruption, maladministration, abuse of authority, bribery, financial irregularities, forged documents, deliberate negligence, and violation of rules against CPCB officers or employees will be treated under a vigilance mechanism. However, complaints arising out of personal rivalry or private grievances will not be entertained under it.

Complaint With Evidence Mandatory

CPCB has clarified in its order that no action will be taken on anonymous complaints or complaints sent under false identity. Written complaints must contain the complainant’s full name, address and contact details. 

Complaints sent through e-mail must also include the postal address and signed documents; failing this, they will be treated as “anonymous” and filed without action.

As per the guidelines, complaints should be brief, specific, and supported by evidence. Vague allegations, generalised accusations or unsubstantiated claims will be rejected without any action. The guidelines also advise against repeatedly sending complaints on the same issue.

Mechanism For Whistleblowers

If a complainant wishes to keep their identity confidential, they may file a complaint under the Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informer Resolution (PIDPIR). Such complaints must be sent directly to the CVC or the designated authority in the Environment Ministry.

CPCB has clarified that its own Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO) will not be treated as the authority for PIDPI complaints.

Complaints may be sent to the CPCB Chairman, Member Secretary or CVO through sealed covers marked “Confidential” or through official e-mail IDs. CPCB has also released separate contact numbers and e-mail addresses for this purpose.

This is a free story, Feel free to share.

facebooktwitterlinkedInwhatsApp